I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different

Mangalapilly, Y. J. (2009, December). I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different. Saṃhitā Notes. https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/

@online{mangalapilly2009i,
          author  = {Yesudeep Jose Mangalapilly},
          title   = {I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different},
          journal = {Sa\d{m}hit\=a Notes},
          year    = {2009},
          month   = {December},
          url     = {https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/},
          urldate = {2009-12-14},
        }

Yesudeep Jose Mangalapilly. “I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different.” Saṃhitā Notes, 2009. https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/.

TY  - ELEC
        AU  - Mangalapilly, Yesudeep Jose
        TI  - I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different
        T2  - Saṃhitā Notes
        PY  - 2009
        UR  - https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/
        Y2  - 2009-12-14
        ER  - 

One of the many reasons I use Emacs is because it gets rid of the “which editor do I use on this OS” problem for me. I'm constantly switching between multiple OSes and having to remember different key-bindings, different functionality, and different user interfaces for different editors/OSes is a major pain. Yes, I prefer using the keyboard to the mouse even on OS X. And Emacs allows me to memorize only one such set.

Now, I can use Aquamacs on OS X, but I don't really think it fits my brain. GNU Emacs, on the other hand, gives me the same “classic” feeling of using it on, say, a Linux OS. Also, accessing Aquamacs from the terminal to do a batch compile of elisp modules is a pain. It doesn't use standard Emacs options and breaks builds for various packages.

Therefore, I ended up removing Aquamacs and installed the build from emacsformacosx.com. But its days were numbered as well. Again, symlinking it and using it in the Terminal is easy, but batch-compiling things fails miserably with errors about architecture dependent locations missing and what-not.

So I decided to build Emacs from the source code. I had all the concerned developer tools and libraries installed so I simply fetched Emacs from the git tree and built two versions–one for the GUI and one for the terminal.

+=$ git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/emacs.git=+\\ =# Update: The repository URL has changed.=
=$ git clone git://repo.or.cz/emacs.git=\\ =$ cd emacs/=

$ ./configure --with-ns     # <-- No --prefix=...
$ make bootstrap
$ make -j4
$ make install        # Yes without sudo.
$ sudo cp -r nextstep/Emacs.app /Applications/Emacs.app

$ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --without-x     # with --prefix=...
$ make bootstrap
$ make -j4
$ sudo make install        # With sudo.

Mangalapilly, Y. J. (2009, December). I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different. Saṃhitā Notes. https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/

@online{mangalapilly2009i,
          author  = {Yesudeep Jose Mangalapilly},
          title   = {I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different},
          journal = {Sa\d{m}hit\=a Notes},
          year    = {2009},
          month   = {December},
          url     = {https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/},
          urldate = {2009-12-14},
        }

Yesudeep Jose Mangalapilly. “I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different.” Saṃhitā Notes, 2009. https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/.

TY  - ELEC
        AU  - Mangalapilly, Yesudeep Jose
        TI  - I like the way Aquamacs looks. I don’t use it because it feels different
        T2  - Saṃhitā Notes
        PY  - 2009
        UR  - https://yesudeep.com/blog/aquamacs-vs-stock-emacs/
        Y2  - 2009-12-14
        ER  -